Mail Archive Search: <+from:TeamZ06@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:TeamZ06@aol.com: 281 ]

Total 281 documents matching your query.

141. Last Call - Evolution SEDiv, Ft Myers (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 05:50:25 EDT; The registration cutoff is fast approaching for the May 4 & 5 Evolution SEDiv Solo2 Championship Series event at Buckingham Airfield in Fort Myers, FL. This event is being generously hosted by the Gu; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00382.html (8,621 bytes)
142. Boxster S reclassification (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 09:26:34 EDT; Regarding the Boxster S reclassification: First, the Boxster S has proven to be competitive with the Mazda RX7TT. If the intention is to move the Boxster S to AS, then the Mazda RX7TT has to go there; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00400.html (8,220 bytes)
143. Re: Boxster S reclassification (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 12:36:55 EDT; I admit that the $55k Boxster S price is something I have only heard. It may have something to do with the options required to be the most competitive or it was just one particular vehicle with certa; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00402.html (7,654 bytes)
144. Re: Boxster S reclassification (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 23:29:01 EDT; Yes, I have run a minority vehicle and do understand the impact. I would have no issue with the Boxster S being reclassified; minority vehicle or not, if it was justified, but to date I haven't seen; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00409.html (8,017 bytes)
145. Re: reclassing (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:18:41 EDT; I was saving my comments on the E46 M3 for later, but I don't know why everyone keeps saying this. Bob has had some very competitive raw SS times, just with cones. No offense to Bob, but the "if Tunn; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00444.html (7,681 bytes)
146. Michelin goes DOT tire racing? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:36:30 EST; One size each in 4 diameters, should be Stock & SP legal if they are the size you need, not cheap though: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/michelin/mi_pilot_sport_cup.jsp Mark /// unsubscribe/change add; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00019.html (7,517 bytes)
147. Re: Michelin goes DOT tire racing? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:56:04 EST; ok, that is one section of the rulebook I haven't read in a while. Show pity on my aging cranial mass. The web page lists tire sections not shown yet, so maybe more are coming in time for the April 3; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00023.html (7,710 bytes)
148. Re: Michelin goes DOT tire racing? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:06:36 EST; Errr, when's the last time checked the price on Hoosiers for a Z06? I'd be more concerned with value, rather than price. If the grip is equivalent but they last 30% longer then the price would not be; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00024.html (7,623 bytes)
149. Re: [evolution-disc.] Rules Clarification / Protest Bait (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 06:42:04 EST; The ceasless anal-ysis and extensive dissertations are for nought. Andy Hollis summarized the situation correctly. It's really a no-brainer .... Mark /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majord; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00029.html (7,082 bytes)
150. C5 vs Worker, guess who lost? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:38:52 EST; At the Fort Myers Tour event my co-driver, Roger O. Johnson, stopped on course because a worker was standing near the racing line. Roger said he thought the worker was going to throw a red flag; the; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00051.html (8,463 bytes)
151. Re: '02 pax index (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 07:36:04 EST; As of 2002 the PAX and RTP indexes are combined: http://www.scca-chicago.com/solo/indexes/rtp02.html Mark Sipe /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://w; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00065.html (6,867 bytes)
152. Re: '02 pax index (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 08:52:28 EST; Probably can't because your coworkers are too busy on the net ;-) On the news recently there is a story about web surfing and email use being down in the US from the previous year. Wonder what the co; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00072.html (7,255 bytes)
153. Re: Progressive Insurance woes (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 23:19:31 EST; Several months ago I put out a post regarding web sites posting un-secure personal info such as autocross results , etc. Quite a few responses poo-poo'd me with "who cares if anyone can read about me; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00203.html (8,392 bytes)
154. Re: April Fast Track shock proposals (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:03:33 EST; It will be immaterial as a shorter body is almost always accompanied by a shorter shaft. It's a packaging constraint. So even if you add a spacer to the body the shaft length/travel range will still; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00224.html (7,299 bytes)
155. Re: April Fast Track shock proposals *facts* (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 23:51:25 EST; First, how is fabricating custom shocks to take advantage of the length allowance any different than having custom wheels fabricated to take advantage of the offset allowance? Furthermore, only the p; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00236.html (8,865 bytes)
156. Re: April Fast Track shock proposals *facts* (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 02:30:06 EST; Charlie, You just don't have the facts straight. The current allowance is 1" *total* length variance. The net effect is you shorten the body 1/2" and the corresponding stroke 1/2" for the 1" total va; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00241.html (8,455 bytes)
157. Re: shock proposals (write a letter) (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 02:41:20 EST; Charlie, It is not my intent to sway or convince the SEB on these forums. IMO you are posting inaccurate information and I am attempting to correct it for the benefit of those who may not realize the; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00242.html (7,467 bytes)
158. Re: modifying OEM shocks (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:46:30 EST; As someone who works in the metal fab business, no hole drilling is required. You just put the shock body in a lathe and cut the shock open along the original weld seam, then weld it up along the sam; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00265.html (8,085 bytes)
159. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: modifying OEM shocks (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:32:23 EST; My post was only intended to address a portion of the argument proposing OEM-only shocks, rather than address a lengthy diatribe point by point. Enforcement of shock absorbers & struts will not be as; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00277.html (8,905 bytes)
160. Re: Member Input of Reservoir Shocks, Not! (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:06:58 EST; Somebody just privately emailed the snip shown above to me. It would appear I was ... <gasp> ... WRONG / INCORRECT / TALKING OUT MY BUTT (take your pick) when I replied to Mark Chiles that there was; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00299.html (7,680 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]