Mail Archive Search: <+from:dkern@napanet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dkern@napanet.net: 142 ]

Total 142 documents matching your query.

41. Re: 4.6 Piston Specs (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 17:26:11 -0800; I would like very much to learn these specs also. Dave Kernberger -- /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net /// Send list postings to mgb-v8@a; /html/mgb-v8/2001-03/msg00025.html (7,479 bytes)
42. Re: Tire circumference (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:04:12 -0800; To the group, In my oppinion, the only specification you want to look for is the "Revolutions per mile." It is usually in the listings I have seen, and obviates the need of much calculation. No calc; /html/mgb-v8/2001-02/msg00048.html (8,195 bytes)
43. Re: Start Up (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:34:25 -0800; Bruce, et al. I feel Jim's advice here is right on target!!!!! This is absolutely the best way to do it. 2 comments: 1) You may have to rotate the oil pump shaft slightly to get the distributor back; /html/mgb-v8/2001-02/msg00133.html (9,354 bytes)
44. Spelling (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:13:18 -0800; For the record--It is "Camaro", not "Camero"!!!!! Or is this some sort of slang I have missed out on--wouldn't surprise me. Cheers, Dave Kernberger /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list /// Sen; /html/mgb-v8/2001-01/msg00057.html (7,082 bytes)
45. Spelling (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:51:01 -0800; Sorry to be a nag but it has been grating on my nerves for a long time. For the record, it is "Camaro", not "Camero." Lots of good info. going around at the moment. I am soaking quite a bit of it up.; /html/mgb-v8/2001-01/msg00105.html (7,074 bytes)
46. Re: New Car (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 18:53:05 -0800; The real question is how can people so glibly talk about this car, or electric cars, or whatever cars, as zero polution??? Hasn't happened yet!!! You have to look at the entire picture. What about t; /html/mgb-v8/2000-11/msg00002.html (8,881 bytes)
47. Re: T% Words of Wisdom (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 15:14:08 -0800; Kevin, A strange question perhaps, but is there actually a front seal on this transmission? Volvo 4-speeds, all American 3-speeds, and all British-made Morris Minor 4-speeds I have ever disassembled; /html/mgb-v8/2000-11/msg00064.html (9,682 bytes)
48. Re: clutch disc (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:17:58 -0700; Jim, Larry, Then the Buick flywheel is very different from the Olds F-85--something I would have not expected. All the stock flywheels I have seen (3) were F-85 and were almost perfectly flat. I jus; /html/mgb-v8/2000-10/msg00018.html (10,556 bytes)
49. Re: Stroking a 4.6 Rover? (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:30:07 -0700; Larry, The stroke on the 300 Buick crank is 3.400". I would love to know the stroke on the 4.6 Rover because I am trying to compile specifications on all the Rover engines for my own information. Th; /html/mgb-v8/2000-10/msg00019.html (9,573 bytes)
50. Flywheel ID (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:28:24 -0700; Thanks to everybody who responded. The part number in my Factory Olds parts book for the F-85 flywheel is 586998. This is not the same as the Buick part number given by James Brown (1350947). The pi; /html/mgb-v8/2000-10/msg00033.html (8,198 bytes)
51. Stroking A Rover 4.6 (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:40:57 -0700; Thanks to Larry, Glenn, John, and Greg for specifications on Rover 4.6 and Leyland P 76 engines. I am trying to digest it all for my own information. Regards, Dave K.; /html/mgb-v8/2000-10/msg00034.html (6,782 bytes)
52. Buick 215 Flywheel (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 21:16:04 -0700; Hello, Though I was in the middle of the discussion, I am still not sure what consensus was arrived at regarding the Buick 215 flywheel. Is it flat or dished? The F-85 wheel is definitely flat. Chee; /html/mgb-v8/2000-10/msg00053.html (7,117 bytes)
53. Buick 215 Flywheel (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:47:24 -0700; Hello again, Thanks for the several responses. I did see the good picture of the flywheel with the raised rim (better terminology than "dished") both times. Obviously I did not ask quite the right q; /html/mgb-v8/2000-10/msg00058.html (7,970 bytes)
54. Re: Torque settings for Rover exhaust manifolds (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:57:45 -0700; Jim, The 61-63 Olds F-85 ex. manifolds came originally without gaskets. Studs, nuts, and flat washers were used. The factory manual shows a torque spec of 18-24 ft. lb. KDon't know if this helps. Re; /html/mgb-v8/2000-10/msg00059.html (10,373 bytes)
55. Re: 215 camshaft "stuff" (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 18:37:16 -0700; Larry, No lock washer needed. At least, not used originally. Flat washer is a special item--about 1 7/16" diameter X abut 5/32" thick--don't know if it is hardened. I have plenty of these washers, a; /html/mgb-v8/2000-09/msg00003.html (8,503 bytes)
56. Re: intake manifold (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:59:17 -0700; Jim, I bought such an Edelbrock manifold back in about 1962 and used it for several years on my '61 Olds F-85. I still have it--You might have seen it listed on my for sale list recently. I just use; /html/mgb-v8/2000-09/msg00066.html (8,082 bytes)
57. Re: stroker 215 question (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:32:08 -0700; May I make a quick reply to both your questions? The question of using the automatic tranny to make a manual bell-housing is indeed an interesting one. What you may not realize is that the housing i; /html/mgb-v8/2000-08/msg00009.html (8,607 bytes)
58. Re: clutch fork boot (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:06:50 -0700; Jim, Thanks for the response. I did not make it clear that the parts book in question covers all models of Oldsmobile, and all years back to about 1950. The number quoted is shown for 61-63 F-85. Re; /html/mgb-v8/2000-08/msg00038.html (8,739 bytes)
59. RE: clutch fork boot (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:43:12 -0700; Jim, Of course. It is 1353484. This is a 3-volume factory parts book as used by all dealership parts departments at that time. I worked in an Olds-Cadillac agency at that time. That is how I have th; /html/mgb-v8/2000-08/msg00040.html (10,037 bytes)
60. RE: 215 buying tips (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 16:56:56 -0700; Greg, If the car is a 62, 63, or late 61, you can be reasonably sure the bell housing will be drilled for both the 3-speed (1 pattern) and the 4-speed (different pattern). In very early 61, before t; /html/mgb-v8/2000-08/msg00061.html (8,831 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]